You are here
Ecology and Vulnerability Wild Turkey
Ecology and Vulnerability
Wild Turkey
Background
The wild turkey is a forest species that has made a tremendous comeback from near extirpation (local extinction) throughout much of its geographic range.1... Read More
Background
The wild turkey is a forest species that has made a tremendous comeback from near extirpation (local extinction) throughout much of its geographic range.1 This rebound was accomplished through reintroductions, habitat management, and game management laws. Today, wild turkeys have reclaimed much of their former range, continue to spread into new areas, such as suburban environments, and are now commonly seen in most of Massachusetts.
Climate Impacts
Wild turkeys appear to be limited by winter weather conditions, including snow depth1,2 and low temperatures3. Severe winters may result in mortality rates as high as 88% among smaller females2. In addition, severe winters reduce egg hatching success4. Factors associated with severe winters can result in substantial declines in turkey populations1,4. Further, deep snows provide a physical impediment to turkeys, reducing their ability to walk and exploit food resources2. In Massachusetts, woodlands located at the highest elevations are unoccupied by wild turkeys due to winter severity and snow depth5.
Some researchers2 noted that turkey responses to winter conditions may explain the wide variation in population size across the range, from threatened to ‘pestilential’ (in some places they are now so common that many people consider them a pest because turkeys can get into gardens or act aggressively during the breeding season). Given the above characteristics, it seems likely that milder winters in Massachusetts will be favorable for turkey populations. Additionally, increases in population sizes seem likely, given the growth in both numbers and distribution that has been seen in many parts of the country.
1. Cardoza, J.E. 2009. The Wild Turkey in Massachusetts. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA.
2. Rioux, S, M. Bélisle, and J.F. Giroux. 2009. Effects of landscape structure on male density and spacing patterns in wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) depend on winter severity. Auk 126:673-683.
3. Oberlag, D.F., P.J. Pekins, and W.W. Mautz. 1990. Influence of seasonal temperatures on wild turkey metabolism. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:663-667.
4. Porter, W.F., G.C. Nelson, and K. Mattson. 1983. Effects of winter conditions on reproduction in a northern wild turkey population. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:281-290.
5. DeGraaf, R.M., M. Yamasaki, W.B. Leak, and J.W. Lanier. 1992. New England wildlife: management of forested habitats. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report NE-144.
6. Humberg, L.A., T.L. Devault, and O.E. Rhodes. Survival and cause-specific mortality of wild turkeys in northern Indiana. American Midland Naturalist 161:313-322.
7. Pack, J.C., G.W. Norman, C.I. Taylor, D.E. Steffen, D.A. Swanson, K.H. Pollock, and R. Alpizar-Jara. Effects of fall hunting on wild turkey populations in Virginia and West Virginia. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:964-975.
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Has already experienced variations in annual precipitation... Read More
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Has already experienced variations in annual precipitation (over the last 50 years)
The factors below decrease this species' vulnerability to climate change:
- Ability to move across the landscape and/or disperse relatively long distances
- Not restricted by the need for specialized habitat
- Depends on natural disturbance that may increase with climate change
- Does not require a specialized diet (eats a wide variety of foods)
- Species may expand range in this area
Hoving, C.L., Y.M. Lee, P.J. Badra, and B.J. Klatt. 2013. Changing climate, changing wildlife: a vulnerability assessment of 400 Species of Greatest Conservation Need and game species in Michigan. Wildlife Division Report No. 3564. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI. Available from: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/3564_Climate_Vulnerability_Divisi...
Related Adaptation Strategies and Actions
Related Species Groups
My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.