You are here
Ecology and Vulnerability New England Cottontail
Ecology and Vulnerability
New England Cottontail
Background
The New England cottontail occurred historically throughout most of New England and eastern New York1. This species is highly dependent on densely... Read More
Background
The New England cottontail occurred historically throughout most of New England and eastern New York1. This species is highly dependent on densely vegetated areas such as coastal thickets or young, brushy forest1. The reforestation of New England combined with extensive development has resulted in a large decline in this habitat type, which has greatly reduced numbers of New England cottontail1,2. As a result, this species is currently limited to five disjunct (geographically separated) populations scattered across New England that have little to no gene flow among them1. The species has come under consideration for federal listing under the Endangered Species Act1. Researchers concluded that without immediate human intervention, short-term persistence of New England cottontail populations in Maine, New Hampshire, and Cape Cod is at great risk1.
Climate Impacts
Predators are the major source of mortality in this species, and the duration of snow cover in the winter can have a strong effect on their survival3,4. Because New England cottontails have a brown coat, they are more conspicuous to predators against a background of white snow4. Additionally, snow cover restricts diet and movement of cottontails5. As a result, the New England cottontail may benefit from decreased snow cover and forest disturbance in the northeast. However, indirect effects through changing relationships with other species, such as predators and competitors, are difficult to predict. For example, if climate change affects eastern cottontails positively and their numbers increase, then there may be increased competition for New England cottontails6.
1. Fenderson, L.E., A.I. Kovach, J.A. Litvaitis, and M.K. Litvaitis. 2011. Population genetic structure and history of fragmented remnant populations of the New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis). Conservation Genetics 12:943-958.
2. DeGraaf, R.M., and M. Yamasaki. 2001. New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis). In: New England Wildlife: Habitat, Natural History, and Distribution. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH.
3. Barbour, M.S., and J.A. Litvaitis. 1993. Niche dimensions of New England cottontails in relation to habitat patch size. Oecologia 95:321-327.
4. Tash, J.P., and J.A. Litvaitis. 2007. Characteristics of occupied habitats and identification of sites for restoration and translocation of New England cottontail populations. Biological Conservation 137:584-598.
5. Dalke, P.D., and P.R. Sime. 1941. Food habits of the eastern and New England cottontails. The Journal of Wildlife Management 5:216-228.
6. Fuller, S., and A. Tur. 2012. Conservation Strategy for the New England Cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis). http://www.newenglandcottontail.org/. (Accessed 1 April 2015).
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Anthropogenic and natural barriers prevent dispersal or... Read More
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Anthropogenic and natural barriers prevent dispersal or shifts in species' range
- Has already experienced slight variations in annual precipitation (over the last 50 years)
- Already at southern edge of range
The factors below decrease this species' vulnerability to climate change:
- Species may expand range in assessment area
Sneddon, L. A., and G. Hammerson. 2014. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments of Selected Species in the North Atlantic LCC Region. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Available from: http://northatlanticlcc.org/projects/completing-northeast-regional-vulne...
This species was identified as moderately vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Natural and anthropogenic barriers prevent dispersal or shifts in species... Read More
This species was identified as moderately vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Natural and anthropogenic barriers prevent dispersal or shifts in species' range
- Reduction in genetic variation within the population may have occured in recent past (genetic bottleneck)
- Already at southern edge of range
The factors below decrease this species' vulnerability to climate change:
- Has already experienced increases in annual precipitation (over the last 50 years)
Schlesinger, M.D., J.D. Corser, K.A. Perkins, and E.L. White. 2011. Vulnerability of at-risk species to climate change in New York. New York Natural Heritage Program, Albany, NY. Available from: https://connect.natureserve.org/sites/default/files/documents/ccvi_repor...
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Requires specialized habitat
- Part of life... Read More
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Requires specialized habitat
- Part of life-cycle depends on a very specific feature of the habitat
- Species distribution is highly fragmented because of habitat loss or populations that are very spread out across the landscape
- Unable to disperse long distances or move across the landscape as conditions change
- Natural and anthropogenic barriers prevent dispersal or shifts in species' range
- Habitat may be affected by invasive species? that are likely to increase
Whitman, A., A. Cutko, P. DeMaynadier, S. Walker, B. Vickery, S. Stockwell, and R. Houston. 2013. Climate change and biodiversity in Maine: vulnerability of habitats and priority species. Report SEI-2013-03. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences (in collaboration with Maine Beginning with Habitat Climate Change Working Group), Brunswick, ME. Available from: https://www.manomet.org/sites/default/files/publications_and_tools/BwHSu...
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Anthropogenic and natural barriers prevent dispersal or... Read More
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Anthropogenic and natural barriers prevent dispersal or shifts in species' range
- Species may shift and perhaps leave this area.
Sneddon, L. A., and G. Hammerson. 2014. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments of Selected Species in the North Atlantic LCC Region. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Available from: http://northatlanticlcc.org/projects/completing-northeast-regional-vulne...
Related Adaptation Strategies and Actions
Related Habitats (broad)
Related Habitats (detailed)
Related Species Groups
My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.