Ecology and Vulnerability
Brook Floater

Image
Brook Floater

Photo credit: CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Scientific name
Alasmidonta varicosa 

Profile: Brook Floater

Background
The brook floater is a freshwater mussel species that inhabits streams and rivers with low to moderate flows1.  When present in fast water, they will often be found in protected pockets...

Read More

Background
The brook floater is a freshwater mussel species that inhabits streams and rivers with low to moderate flows1.  When present in fast water, they will often be found in protected pockets behind boulders.  Brook floater are never found in lakes or reservoirs.  They appear to require relatively undisturbed stream reaches and have little tolerance for stressors such as dams, urban areas, and poor water quality.  Brook floaters are found in Atlantic coastal rivers from South Carolina to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.  As with other mussel species, the larval phase is a parasite that requires a fish host for development, after which it will drop off to continue development as a benthic adult.  Several potential host fish species for brook floaters have been identified in lab settings, but it is unknown if these are all hosts under natural conditions.  Adults live partially buried in the sediment where they filter algae, bacteria, zooplankton, and sediment from the water.

Freshwater mussels in general have experienced large declines2 and the brook floater is no exception.  It is one of the most endangered mussels in northeastern North America and is listed as endangered in Massachusetts1.  Remaining populations in Massachusetts are fragmented and appear to consist mostly of older adults showing little evidence of recent reproduction.

Climate Impacts
Brook floaters have a high thermal tolerance so even significant warming of Massachusetts waters is not likely to reach lethal temperatures.  Lethal temperature for the most sensitive developmental stage is approximately 35°C/95°F3, which is about 10°C/18°F warmer than for the coldwater fish species, brook trout, currently found in Massachusetts4.  It is unknown how sublethal temperatures may affect brook floaters, although water temperature directly relates to water quality such as dissolved oxygen.  As water temperature increases, the amount of dissolved oxygen that water can hold decreases5.  Additionally, a lengthened growing season and increased evapotranspiration are projected to increase the frequency of short-term drought conditions6.  Potentially, such changes could impact water quality in ways that affect brook floater populations7

Because mussels require a host fish species for larval development1,7, impacts on these fish could also impact mussels.  Species identified as potential hosts for brook floaters include cold to cool water species, such as blacknose dace and slimy sculpin. These fish require cooler temparatures and may be impacted by significant warming of stream water 8

References

1. Nedeau, E.J. 2008. Freshwater Mussels and the Connecticut River Watershed. Connecticut River Watershed Council, Greenfield, MA.

2. Strayer, D.L., and H.M. Malcom. 2012. Causes of recruitment failure in freshwater mussel populations in southeastern New York. Ecological Applications 22:1780-1790.

3. Pandolfo, T.J., W.G. Cope, C. Arellano, R.B. Bringolf, M.C. Barnhart, and E. Hammer. 2010. Upper thermal tolerances of early life stages of freshwater mussels. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29:959-969.

4. McCormick, J.H., K.E.F. Hokanson, and B.R. Jones. 1972. Effects of temperature on growth and survival of young brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29:1107-1112.

5. Watt, M.K. 2000. A hydrologic primer for New Jersey watershed management. Water Resources Investigation Report 00-4140. US Geologial Survey, West Trenton, NJ.

6. Huntington, T.G., A.D. Richardson, K.J. McGuire, and K. Hayhoe. 2009. Climate and hydrological changes in the northeastern United States: recent trends and implications for forested and aquatic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:199-212.

7. Vaughn, C.C., C.L. Atkinson, and J.P. Julian. 2015. Drought-induced changes in flow regimes lead to long-term losses in mussel-provided ecosystem services. Ecology and Evolution 5:1291-1305.

8. Pandolfo, T.J., T.J. Kwak, and W.G. Cope. 2012. Thermal tolerances of freshwater mussels and their host fishes: species interactions in a changing climate. Walkerana 15:69-82.

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Brook Floater (Maine)

Ranking
Highly Vulnerable
Confidence
Very High
Climate scenario
None specified
Location
Maine
Time period
None specified

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Brook Floater (Northern Appalacians & Maritime Canada)

Ranking
Presumed Stable
Confidence
Very High
Climate scenario
SRES A1B (Mid-range emissions scenario)
Location
Northern Appalacians & Maritime Canada
Time period
2050

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Brook Floater (North Atlantic Coast)

Ranking
Presumed Stable
Confidence
Very High
Climate scenario
SRES A1B (Mid-range emissions scenario)
Location
North Atlantic Coast
Time period
2050

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Brook Floater (Mid-Atlantic Coast)

Ranking
Presumed Stable
Confidence
Very High
Climate scenario
SRES A1B (Mid-range emissions scenario)
Location
Mid-Atlantic Coast
Time period
2050

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Brook Floater (New York)

Ranking
Extremely Vulnerable
Confidence
Moderate
Climate scenario
SRES A1B (Mid-range emissions scenario)
Location
New York
Time period
2050

Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Brook Floater (West Virginia)

Ranking
Extremely Vulnerable
Confidence
Moderate
Climate scenario
SRES A1B (Mid-range emissions scenario)
Location
West Virginia
Time period
2050