Ecology and Vulnerability
Barndoor Skate
Photo Credit: NEFSC/NOAA
Profile: Barndoor Skate ▾▸
Many studies provide strong evidence that marine fish and elasmobranch species respond to climate change through geographical range (Nye et al., 2009) and phenology shifts (Staudinger et al., 2019...
Many studies provide strong evidence that marine fish and elasmobranch species respond to climate change through geographical range (Nye et al., 2009) and phenology shifts (Staudinger et al., 2019; Langan et al., 2021). Studies of range shifts generally use long-term federal datasets from spring and fall bottom trawl (NOAA Fisheries, 2022) and ichthyoplankton Ecosystem Monitoring (EcoMon) (Walsh et al., 2015) surveys of the continental shelf or by state and private surveys of regional bays and estuaries (Morson et al., 2019, Snyder et al., 2019; Langan et al., 2021). These extensive monitoring programs have shown that centers of population biomass for most marine fish species are shifting poleward towards higher latitudes and to greater depths at rates that exceed terrestrial species (Lenoir et al., 2020). These general trends are projected to continue under future climate scenarios of modeled habitat abundance (Kleisner et al., 2017), suitable thermal habitat (Morley et al., 2018), and relative population biomass (Allyn et al., 2020).
An analysis of 42 species of marine fish and invertebrates (RSGCN and non-RSGCN species) found in continental shelf waters of the Northeast region between 1974 and 2022, showed the community has shifted on average 0.75 degrees (83.83 km) north during spring, and 0.61 degrees (68.27 km) north during fall. The community also experienced a change in average depth of 22.4 meters and 8.6 meters deeper in spring and fall, respectively (NOAA Fisheries, 2022). Similar to patterns observed at the community scale and for non-RSGCN species, the direction, rate, and magnitude of range shifts varies widely among RSGCN marine fishes and elasmobranchs sampled during this period; responses in range changes span -0.51 km southward in Winter Skate, to 2.25 km northward in Black Sea Bass during spring, and -0.21 km northward in Atlantic Herring to 2.05 km northward in Black Sea Bass during fall. Depth range shifts spanned from -61.08 meters deeper in Atlantic Herring to 12.41 km shallower in Atlantic Cod in spring and -50.88 meters deeper in Atlantic Herring to 31.20 meters shallower in Atlantic Halibut during fall (NOAA Fisheries, 2022).
Shifts in phenology are more difficult to track compared to range shifts in aquatic species because observations need repeated observations within a narrow and set area over multiple decades (Staudinger et al., 2019). Several multi-species analyses have shown phenological shifts in the occurrence of larval phases of demersal groundfishes (Walsh et al., 2015), growth and productivity of population biomass (Henderson et al., 2017), as well as seasonal migration patterns (both ingress and egress) and residence times in estuaries systems such as Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island (Langan et al., 2021).
As species make distributional changes in range and phenology, primarily in response to warming sea surface and bottom temperatures, entire assemblages of marine species are reshuffling and reorganizing across Northeast coastal ecosystems (Weiskopf et al., 2020; Staudinger et al., 2021). Examples of changes in community structure through altered species diversity, population size, and density have been documented across the Northeast continental shelf (Friedland et al., 2020) and in estuaries including Little Egg Inlet, New Jersey (Morson et al., 2019), Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island (Langan et al., 2021), and Long Island Sound off of New York and Connecticut (Snyder et al., 2019). Ensembles of warm-water-associated species that are moving north into temperate habitats are generally replacing cold-water-associated species, which are moving to deeper depths and higher latitudes in search of cold-water refugia (Friedland et al., 2020; Pershing et al., 2021).
On a global scale, warming has led to a decrease in body size (Sheridan and Bickford 2011) but this varies widely by species and local conditions. The indirect effects of morphological and behavioral changes combined with shifting distributions are changing predator-prey and competitive relationships among associated marine fish species and resulting in novel trophic interactions (Staudinger et al., 2021). Most models that project range shifts currently do not account for species interactions (Pearson and Dawson, 2003; MacPherson et al., 2021); this is an area of active research as changes in trophic relationships are hypothesized to be more important for species survival under future conditions than environmental conditions (Louthan et al., 2015, Staniczenko et al., 2017). In addition, the combined stress from warming ocean temperatures, decreased dissolved oxygen, and ocean acidification is increasing the prevalence and vulnerability to disease and predation.
Shifts in Ranges, Elevation, or Depth
Between the periods of 1974-1977 and 2019-2022, Barndoor Skates shifted and expanded their spring range across the Northeast continental shelf by 0.35 degrees (39.96 km) south and 2.24 degrees (248.49 km), respectively. Barndoor Skates also shifted and expanded their fall range by 0.04 degrees (4.94 km) north and 0.77 degrees (85.43 km) from 1974-1976 to 2019- 2022. Over the same periods, Barndoor Skate moved 70.9 meters into deeper waters during spring and 2.3 meters shallower during fall (NOAA Fisheries, 2022). Barndoor Skates were projected to experience a significant loss of relative biomass during fall by 2050 across the Northeast continental shelf, with higher decreases projected in the Southern New England – MidAtlantic region compared to the Gulf of Maine under mean model projections using the RCP 8.5 scenario (Allyn et al., 2020). Barndorr Skates are projected to shift the centroid of their range along the coast of Eastern Canada by 279.2 km under RCP 2.6 and 875.6 km under RCP 8.5 by the end of the century (2081-2100), with projected changes in available thermal habitat of 152.8% under a RCP 2.6 and -86.8% under RCP 8.5 when compared to the period of 2006-2020 (Morely et al., 2018).
References
Allyn AJ, Alexander MA, Franklin BS, Massiot-Granier F, Pershing AJ, Scott JD, et al., (2020) Comparing and synthesizing quantitative distribution models and qualitative vulnerability assessments to project marine species distributions under climate change. PLoS ONE 15 (4): e0231595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231…
Friedland, K. D., Langan, J. A., Large, S. I., Selden, R. L., Link, J. S., Watson, R. A., & Collie, J. S. (2020). Changes in higher trophic level productivity, diversity and niche space in a rapidly warming continental shelf ecosystem. Science of the Total Environment, 704(135270).
Henderson, M. E., Mills, K. E., Thomas, A. C., Pershing, A. J., & Nye, J. A. (2017). Effects of spring onset and summer duration on fish species distribution and biomass along the Northeast United States continental shelf. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 27(2), 411–424.
Kleisner, K., Fogarty, M., Mcgee, S., Hare, J., Morét, S., & Perretti, C. (2017). Marine species distribution shifts on the U.S. Northeast Continental Shelf under continued ocean warming. Prog. In Oceanogr, 153, 24–36.
Langan et al., 2021
Lenoir, J., Bertrand, R., Comte, L., Bourgeaud, L., Hattab, T., Murienne, J., & Grenouillet, G. (2020). Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(8), 1044–1059.
Louthan, A. M., Doak, D. F., & Angert, A. L. (2015). Where and when do species interactions set range limits? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(12), 780–792.
MacPherson, M. P., Burgio, K. R., DeSaix, M. G., Freeman, B. G., Herbert, J., Herman, R., Jirinec, V., Shonfield, J., Slager, D. L., Rees, C. B., & Jankowski, J. E. (2021). Predicting Bird Distributions Under Climate Change. bioRxiv, 2021(5).
Morley, C., Unwin, M., Peterson, G. M., Stankovich, J., & Kinsman, L. (2018). Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PloS one, 13(8), e0203316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203…
Morson, J. M., Grothues, T., & Able, K. W. (2019). Change in larval fish assemblage in a USA east coast estuary estimated from twenty-six years of fixed weekly sampling. PLoS ONE, 14(10).
NOAA Fisheries. 2022. DisMAP data records. Retrieved from apps- st.fisheries.noaa.gov/dismap/DisMAP.html. Accessed 1/25/2024.
Nye, J. A., Link, J. S., Hare, J. A., & Overholtz, W. J. (2009). Changing spatial distribution of fish stocks in relation to climate and population size on the Northeast United States continental shelf. Marine Ecology-Progress Series, 393, 111–129.
Pearson, R. G., & Dawson, T. P. (2003). Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12(5), 361-1174 371.
Pershing, AJ, et al. 2021. Climate impacts on the Gulf of Maine ecosystem: A review of observed and expected changes in 2050 from rising temperatures. Elem Sci Anth, 9: 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.000…
Sheridan, J. A., & Bickford, D. (2011). Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 1, 401–406.
Snyder, J. T., Whitney, M. M., Dam, H. G., Jacobs, M. W., & Baumann, H. (2019). Citizen science observations reveal rapid, multi-decadal ecosystem changes in eastern Long Island Sound. Marine Environmental Research, 146, 80–88.
Staniczenko, P. P. A., Sivasubramaniam, P., Suttle, K. B., & Pearson, R. G. (2017). Linking macroecology and community ecology: Refining predictions of species distributions using biotic interaction networks. Ecology Letters, 20(6), 693–707.
Staudinger, M. D., Lynch, A. J., Gaichas, S. K., Fox, M. G., Gibson‐Reinemer, D., Langan, J. A., Teffer, A. K., Thackeray, S. J., & Winfield, I. J. (2021). How Does Climate Change Affect Emergent Properties of Aquatic Ecosystems? Fisheries, 46(9), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10606
Staudinger, M. D., Mills, K. E., Stamieszkin, K., Record, N. R., Hudak, C. A., Allyn, A., Diamond, A., Friedland, K. D., Golet, W., Henderson, M. E., Hernandez, C. M., Huntington, T. G., Ji, R., Johnson, C. L., Johnson, D. S., Jordaan, A., Kocik, J., Li, Y., Liebman, M., … Yakola, K. (2019). It’s about time: A synthesis of changing phenology in the Gulf of Maine ecosystem. Fisheries Oceanography, 28(5), 532–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12429
Walsh, H. J., Richardson, D. E., Marancik, K. E., & Hare, J. A. (2015). Long‐term changes in the distributions of larval and adult fish in the Northeast U.S. Shelf Ecosystem. PLoS ONE, 10(9), 0137382.
Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., Hyde, K. J. W., Morelli, T. L., Morisette, J. T., Muñoz, R. C., Pershing, A. J., Peterson, D. L., Poudel, R., Staudinger, M. D., Sutton-Grier, A. E., Thompson, L., Vose, J., Weltzin, J. F., & Whyte, K. P. (2020). Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States. Science of the Total Environment, 733(137782).
Climate Change Vulnerability: Barndoor Skate (Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf)
References
Hare, J. A., Morrison, W. E., Nelson, M. W., Stachura, M. M., Teeters, E. J., Griffis, R. B., Alexander, M. A., Scott, J. D., Alade, L., Bell, R. J., & Chute, A. S. (2016). A vulnerability assessment of fish and invertebrates to climate change on the Northeast U.S. continental shelf. PloS one, 11(2), e0146756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146…;