You are here
Ecology and Vulnerability American Woodcock
Displayed are DSL Landscape Capability (LC) data for the American Woodcock for 2010 (DSL Current) and the future (DSL 2080); higher values shown in dark red. LC incorporates habitat, climate, and prevalence to estimate suitable and accessible conditions for the species. LC values can't be compared across species. Courtesy of K. McGarigal, UMass.
Also displayed is the species distribution from USGS GAP.
HideDisplayed are DSL Landscape Capability (LC) data for the American Woodcock for 2010 (DSL Current) and the...
Read More
Ecology and Vulnerability
American Woodcock
Background
The American woodcock is a migratory bird species that winters along the Atlantic and Gulf coastal plains from the Carolinas to Texas and breeds in the North... Read More
Background
The American woodcock is a migratory bird species that winters along the Atlantic and Gulf coastal plains from the Carolinas to Texas and breeds in the North American temperate zone, including Massachusetts1,2. Within temperate regions, it is dependent on shrub-dominated and early successional habitats, where the younger forest's dense vegetation protects them from predators and allows them to reach higher population densities than in more mature forest. The replacement of this habitat type with mid-aged to mature forest over the past several decades has resulted in population declines of woodcock in the eastern U.S.3,4. Although woodcock may eat a variety of invertebrates, earthworms can be anywhere from 30-100% of their diet and woodcock distributions have been found to be associated with the availability of earthworms4,5. Because earthworms are most available when soil moisture is between 15 to 80%, woodcock are also associated with moist, rich soil conditions5,6.
Climate Impacts
Studies have found phenological (seasonal timing) changes in some aspects of American woodcock life history. Changes include earlier date of spring arrival in Massachusetts and New York7, earlier date of first arrival in Maine8, and earlier date of their breeding call in Wisconsin9. Some of these researchers have attributed these changes to the effects of climate change. One researcher noted that, taken to the extreme, such changes could result in some birds remaining at breeding locations year-round7.
One modeling study determined that although habitat is an important predictor of woodcock population numbers, the date of the start of the growing season is the strongest predictor, with a later date corresponding to lower numbers of American woodcock10. The researchers speculated that this is likely related to the impact that growing season has on the availability of earthworms, a primary food source for woodcock. Based on this variable alone, an earlier growing season as a result of climate change could potentially favor higher woodcock abundance in Massachusetts, but this would have to be accompanied by changes in forest habitat from mid-age and older forest to early or younger forest. However, warmer temperatures, lengthened growing season, and increased evapotranspiration (loss of water from soil and plants from evaporation and transpiration) are all anticipated to result in increased short-term drought frequency in the Northeast11. Such droughts are defined by soil moisture content below 10% by volume. These conditions may make earthworms less available to woodcock, which could potentially negatively impact populations. Modeling conducted by the University of Massachusetts suggests that future climate scenarios should have a negative, though relatively small, impact on woodcock populations in the Northeast12.
1. Galbraith, H., D.W. DesRochers, S. Brown, and J.M. Reed. 2014. Predicting vulnerabilities of North American shorebirds to climate change. PloS ONE 9:e108899.
2. Massachusetts Audubon. 2015. American woodcock Scolopax minor. Breeding Bird Atlas 1 Species Accounts. < http://www.massaudubon.org/our-conservation-work/wildlife-research-conse...(id)/218> (Accessed 6 May 2015).
3. Dessecker, D.R., and D.G. McAuley. 2001. Importance of early successional habitat to ruffed grouse and American woodcock. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29:456-465.
4. Masse, R.J., B.C. Tefft, and S.R. McWilliams. 2014. Multiscale habitat selection by a forest-dwelling shorebird, the American woodcock: Implications for forest management in southern New England, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 325:37-48.
5. Cade, B.S. 1985. Habitat suitability index models: American woodcock (wintering). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 82(10.105) 23 pp.
6. Williamson, S.J. 2010. American woodcock: Best management practices for the Northeast. In: Wildlife Insight 89, US Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
7. Butler, C.J. 2003. The disproportionate effect of global warming on the arrival dates of short-distance migratory birds in North America. Ibis 145:484-495.
8. Wilson, W.H., D. Kipervaser, and S.A. Lilley. 2000. Spring arrival dates of Maine migratory breeding birds: 1994-1997 vs. 1899-1911. Northeastern Naturalist 7:1-6.
9. Bradley, N.L., A.C. Leopold, J. Ross, and W. Huffaker. 1999. Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:9701-9704.
10. Thogmartin, W.E., J.R. Sauer, and M.G. Knutson. 2007. Modeling and mapping abundance of American woodcock across the Midwestern and Northeastern United States. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71:376-382.
11. Huntington, T.G., A.D. Richardson, K.J. McGuire, and K. Hayhoe. 2009. Climate and hydrological changes in the northeastern United States: recent trends and implications for forested and aquatic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:199-212.
12. DeLuca, W., and K. McGarigal. 2014. DSL Project Component: Species. Available at < http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/dsl/documents/dsl_documents.html> (Accessed 29 April 2015).
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Requires specialized habitat
- Part of life-cycle... Read More
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Requires specialized habitat
- Part of life-cycle depends on a very specific feature of the habitat
- Species distribution is highly fragmented because of habitat loss or populations that are very spread out across the landscape
- Dependent on stable hydrology for survival and reproduction (e.g. precipitation, stream flows, flooding, standing water)
- Sensitive to disruption of relationship with very few prey or host species that is vulnerable to climate change
Whitman, A., A. Cutko, P. DeMaynadier, S. Walker, B. Vickery, S. Stockwell, and R. Houston. 2013. Climate change and biodiversity in Maine: vulnerability of habitats and priority species. Report SEI-2013-03. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences (in collaboration with Maine Beginning with Habitat Climate Change Working Group), Brunswick, ME. Available from: https://www.manomet.org/sites/default/files/publications_and_tools/BwHSu...
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Very sensitive to changes in... Read More
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Very sensitive to changes in precipitation
The factors below decrease this species' vulnerability to climate change:
- Able to disperse and move across the landscape
Byers, E., and S. Norris. 2011. Climate change vulnerability assessment of species of concern in West Virginia. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins, West Virginia. Available from: http://wvdnr.gov/publications/PDFFiles/ClimateChangeVulnerability.pdf
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Has already experienced slight variations in annual... Read More
Although this species was identified as not vulnerable to climate change, the following factors increase vulnerability:
- Has already experienced slight variations in annual precipitation (over the last 50 years)
- Requires a slightly specialized diet (eats a limited variety of foods)
The factors below decrease this species' vulnerability to climate change:
- Ability to move across the landscape and/or disperse relatively long distances
- Not restricted by the need for specialized habitat
Hoving, C.L., Y.M. Lee, P.J. Badra, and B.J. Klatt. 2013. Changing climate, changing wildlife: a vulnerability assessment of 400 Species of Greatest Conservation Need and game species in Michigan. Wildlife Division Report No. 3564. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Lansing, MI. Available from: https://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/3564_Climate_Vulnerability_Divisi...
This species was identified as highly vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Moderate loss of suitable breeding habitat expected
- Specialized... Read More
This species was identified as highly vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Moderate loss of suitable breeding habitat expected
- Specialized habitat required for breeding
The factors below decrease this species' vulnerability to climate change:
- Moderate increase in suitable wintering and migration habitat expected
Galbraith, H., D. W. DesRochers, S. Brown, J. M. Reed. 2014. Predicting Vulnerabilities of North American Shorebirds to Climate Change. PLoS ONE 9(9): e108899. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0108899
Related Adaptation Strategies and Actions
Related Habitats (broad)
Related Habitats (detailed)
Related Species Groups
My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.