Ecology and Vulnerability
American Shad
Photo credit: Bill Byrne, MassWildlife
Profile: American Shad ▾▸
Background
American shad are an anadromous (a species of fish that moves from the sea to a river for spawning) species of fish that undergoes extensive ocean and freshwater migrations1. Historically...
Background
American shad are an anadromous (a species of fish that moves from the sea to a river for spawning) species of fish that undergoes extensive ocean and freshwater migrations1. Historically, shad may have migrated up to 620 mi/1,000 km upstream in coastal rivers to spawn1. Shad range along the Atlantic coast from northern Florida to the St. Lawrence River in Canada, and are most abundant between North Carolina and Connecticut1. Populations once occurred in nearly 140 rivers extending from the Pinware River in Labrador to the St. John’s River in Florida2. Current populations are greatly reduced from historical levels, resulting in the closure of some fisheries2.
In the Connecticut River, shad spawn in May and June3. Surviving adults leave the river by mid-August and migrate to summer feeding grounds in the Gulf of Maine3. In November, when water temperatures drop below 12°C/53.6°F, fish migrate south to Florida until February, when they begin migrating back towards the Connecticut River3.
Climate Impacts
Shad start spawning, leave rivers, and make ocean migrations based on temperature3,4. Fish from the Connecticut River move south to Florida by following the 12-13°C (between 53-56°F) isotherm, which is a line of temperature that changes with the seasons3. Introduced shad in the Columbia River are migrating more than five weeks earlier than they did in 1949 following a long-term warming trend (related to multiple factors including construction of impoundments)4,5, which suggests that changes in migration timing are likely due to climate change4.
Many aspects of shad life-history follow latitudinal gradients that are likely to be linked to climatic factors. South of Cape Hatteras, shad are semelparous (they die after spawning) while north of Cape Hatteras, they are iteroparous (many individuals will survive spawning, return to the ocean, and spawn again in subsequent years)6. In addition, the degree of iteroparity increases moving north from Cape Hatteras. Spawning occurs earlier in southern latitudes, timed to correspond with optimal temperatures for survival of eggs and larvae4. Additionally, the proportion of shad that are mature by age five increases from north to south, with 25% of New England fish compared to 70% of South Carolina fish maturing at age five7. This all implies that climate has the potential to have multiple direct effects on shad life-history, complicating predictions about response to climate. In addition to these direct effects, higher temperatures favor colonization of new habitats by invasive zebra mussels4. Colonization of the Hudson River by zebra mussels has been associated with slower growth and reduced abundance of American shad4.
Studies in the Connecticut River have shown that high river flows and low temperatures during spring spawning result in high mortality of eggs and larvae3. These two factors were correlated with year-class strength in the period from 1966 to 19733. Based on this information, increased temperatures might be expected to favor shad abundance in the Connecticut River. However, how temperature might interact with flow is unclear. Projections for the Northeast suggest a longer period of summer low flows8, which could be favorable for spawning shad. However, other hydrological changes are expected, including earlier timing of peak spring flows9 and increased frequency of extreme storm events8.
1. Leggett, W.C. 1976. The American shad (Alosa sapidissima), with special reference to its migration and population dynamics in the Connecticut River. Pages 169-225 in D. Merriman, L.M. Thorpe, editors. The Connecticut River ecological study, vol 1. American Fisheries Society, Washington, D.C.
2. Waldman, J., D. Hasselman, P. Bentzen, M. Dadswell, L. Maceda, and I. Wirgin. 2014. Genetic mixed-stock analysis of American shad in two Atlantic coast fisheries: Delaware Bay, USA, and inner Bay of Fundy, Canada. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 34:1190-1198.
3. Savoy, T.F., V.A. Crecco, and B.C. Marcy. 2004. American shad early life history and recruitment in the Connecticut River: A 40-year summary. American Fisheries Society Monograph 9:407-417.
4. Kerr, L.A., W.J. Connelly, E.J. Martino, A.C. Peer, R.J. Woodland, and D.H. Secor. 2009. Climate change in the U.S. Atlantic affecting recreational fisheries. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17:267-289.
5. Hinrichsen, R.A., D.J. Hasselman, C.C. Ebbesmeyer, and B.A. Shields. 2013. The role of impoundments, temperature, and discharge on colonization of the Columbia River Basin, USA, by nonindigenous American shad. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:887-900.
6. O’Connor, M.P., F. Juanes, K. McGarigal, and S. Gaurin. 2012. Findings on American shad and striped bass in the Hudson River estuary: A fish community study of the long-term effects of local hydrology and regional climate change. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 4:327-336.
7. Tuckey, T.D., and J.E. Olney. 2010. Maturity schedules of female American shad vary at small spatial scales in Chesapeake Bay. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30:1020-1031.
8. Huntington, T.G., A.D. Richardson, K.J. McGuire, and K. Hayhoe. 2009. Climate and hydrological changes in the northeastern United States: recent trends and implications for forested and aquatic ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:199-212.
9. Frumhoff, P.C., J.J. McCarthy, J.M. Melillo, S.C. Moser, and D.J. Wuebbles. 2007. Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast: Science, impacts, and solutions. Synthesis report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment (NECIA). Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS).