You are here
Ecology and Vulnerability Alewife
Streams where Alewife have been observed (by Mass DFW personnel) shown in orange.
Also mapped is the estimated presence and absence Alewife during the 1978-2016 Spring (green) and Fall (blue) Resource Trawling Surveys. Categories are based on the aggregation behavior of the species. Data provided by MA Division of Marine Fisheries.
HideStreams where Alewife have been observed (by...
Read More
Ecology and Vulnerability
Alewife
Background
River herring is a term used to refer collectively to alewife and blueback herring. The two... Read More
Background
River herring is a term used to refer collectively to alewife and blueback herring. The two species are commonly referenced together as they have similar life histories and look very similar1. They are native to the Atlantic coast of North America and co-occur in rivers throughout much of their range1. The native range of alewife extends from northern Canada to South Carolina, while that of blueback herring extends from the Gulf of St. Lawrence to Florida2. Both species are anadromous, returning to their native freshwater to spawn after 3-6 years in the ocean3. Alewife use stream corridors to access ponds for spawning, although they will also use quiet reaches of rivers, whereas blueback herring prefer flowing waters for spawning3,4. Alewife spawn at cooler temperatures than blueback herring and as a result begin spawning 3-4 weeks earlier. Despite these differences, there is much overlap in spawning timing of the two species2. River herring are iteroparous, which means that they return to freshwater to spawn multiple times4. In New England, spawning may extend from late March to early June5. Adult river herring migrate to the ocean after spawning, while juveniles migrate from nursery habitats in fall of the same year6.
River herring are an important source of food for many species of birds and fish6. Historically, river herring supported thriving fisheries7. Although early dam construction, habitat degradation, and fishing resulted in large declines, a stable fishery existed through the 1960s7. Recent declines have been sudden and prompted a petition to consider the two species for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), but the petition was denied and the species are unlisted8. Recent declines may be due to overharvest in marine fisheries and higher levels of natural mortality due to rebounding striped bass populations8,9.
Climate Impacts
Anadromous species, like alewife and blueback herring, use a wide range of habitats throughout their life cycle, making predictions about responses to climate change particularly complicated. Each life stage is likely to be impacted in a unique way8. However, initiation of spawning is known to be cued by temperature2. Many studies have found long-term warming trends for North American rivers over the past century10. Spring water temperatures in several New England streams have begun reaching suitable spawning temperatures about twelve days earlier than in the 1970s, implying that runs of river herring are occurring earlier10.
Warming in the marine environment has also been observed and will likely increase11. Such warming is expected to shift distributions of many fish species poleward. A similar shift has already been observed for alewife, and may continue, given predictions for future warming11.
The recent petition to list river herring under the ESA prompted a modeling study to isolate the impacts of climate change on river herring populations8. This study determined that overall, climate change is likely to impact river herring populations negatively in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean, from Cape Hatteras in North Carolina to the Gulf of Maine, with reductions in suitable habitat. However, the authors of the study were careful to note that these projections isolate the effects of ocean warming and that these effects will not occur independently of other stressors, including biotic interactions and the effects of dams.
1. Loesch, J.G. 1987. Overview of life history aspects of anadromous alewife and blueback herring in freshwater habitats. Pages 89-103 in M.J. Dadswell, R.J. Klauda, C.M. Moffitt, R.L. Saunders, R.A. Rulifson, J.E. Cooper, editors. Common strategies of anadromous and catadromous fishes. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.
2. Hasselman, D.J., E.E. Argo, M.C. McBride, P. Bentzen, T.F. Schultz, A.A. Perez-Umphrey, and E.P Palkovacs. 2014. Human disturbance causes the formation of a hybrid swarm between two naturally sympatric fish species. Molecular Ecology 23:1137-1152.
3. Mather, M.E., H.J. Frank, J.M. Smith, R.D. Cormier, R.M. Muth, and J.T. Finn. 2012. Assessing freshwater habitat of adult anadromous alewives using multiple approaches. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 4:188–200.
4. Hall, C.J., A. Jordaan, and M.G. Frisk. 2011. The historic influence of dams on diadromous fish habitat with a focus on river herring and hydrologic longitudinal connectivity. Landscape Ecology 26:95-107.
5. Durbin, A., S. Nixon, and C. Oviatt. 1979. Effects of the spawning migration of the Alewife, Alosa-Pseudoharengus, on freshwater ecosystems. Ecology 60:8–17.
6. Post, D.M., E.P. Palkovacs, E.G. Schielke, and S.I. Dodson. 2008. Intraspecific variation in a predator affects community structure and cascading trophic interactions. Ecology 89:2019-2032.
7. Palkovacs, E.P., D.J. Hasselman, E.E. Argo, S.R. Gephard, K.E. Limburg, D.M. Post, T.F. Schultz, and T.V. Willis. 2013. Combining genetic and demographic information to prioritize conservation efforts for anadromous alewife and blueback herring. Evolutionary Applications 7:212-226.
8. Lynch, P.D., J.A. Nye, J.A. Hare, C.A. Stock, M.A. Alexander, J.D. Scott, K.L. Curti, and K. Drew. 2015. Projected ocean warming creates a conservation challenge for river herring populations. ICES Journal of Marine Science 72:374-387.
9. Gahagan, B.I., K.E. Gherard, and E.T. Schultz. 2010. Environmental and endogenous factors influencing emigration in juvenile anadromous alewives. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1069-1082.
10. Ellis, D., and J.C. Vokoun. 2009. Earlier spring warming of coastal streams and implications for alewife migration timing. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 29:1584-1589.
11. Nye, J.A, J.S. Link, J.A. Hare, and W.J. Overholtz. 2009. Changing spatial distribution of fish stocks in relation to climate and population size on the Northeast United States continental shelf. Marine Ecology Progress Series 393:111-129.
You are here
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Alewife (Northeast Atlantic Continental Shelf)
Primary tabs
Submitted by smattocks on
Unpublished
This species was identified as highly vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Increasing ocean surface temperature
- Ocean acidification
- Increasing air temperature
- Early life history requirements
- Spawning cycle
- Complexity in reproduction
Hare J.A., W.E. Morrison, M.W. Nelson, N.M. Stachura, E.J. Teeters, R.B Griffis, et al. 2016. A Vulnerability Assessment of Fish and Invertebrates to Climate Change on the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf. PLoS ONE 11: e0146756. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0146756
Add new comment
-My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
You can share your favorites list with others using this link: https://staging.climateactiontool.org/favorites/127
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.
© 2016 University of Massachusetts Amherst | This site is maintained by The Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment in the College of Natural Sciences at UMass Amherst
Site Policies | UMass Extension Civil Rights and Non-Discrimination Information
You are here
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Alewife (Northeast Atlantic Continental Shelf)
Primary tabs
Submitted by smattocks on
Unpublished
This species was identified as highly vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Increasing ocean surface temperature
- Ocean acidification
- Increasing air temperature
- Early life history requirements
- Spawning cycle
- Complexity in reproduction
Hare J.A., W.E. Morrison, M.W. Nelson, N.M. Stachura, E.J. Teeters, R.B Griffis, et al. 2016. A Vulnerability Assessment of Fish and Invertebrates to Climate Change on the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf. PLoS ONE 11: e0146756. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0146756
Add new comment
-My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
You can share your favorites list with others using this link: https://staging.climateactiontool.org/favorites/127
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.
© 2016 University of Massachusetts Amherst | This site is maintained by The Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment in the College of Natural Sciences at UMass Amherst
Site Policies | UMass Extension Civil Rights and Non-Discrimination Information
Related Adaptation Strategies and Actions
Related Habitats (broad)
Related Habitats (detailed)
Related Species Groups
My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.