You are here
Ecology and Vulnerability Coastal: Shellfish beds
Ecology and Vulnerability
Coastal: Shellfish beds
Background
Shellfish beds in Massachusetts are made up of bivalve mollusks such as oysters, sea scallops, razor clams, soft-shell clams, blue mussels, and northern Quahogs... Read More
Background
Shellfish beds in Massachusetts are made up of bivalve mollusks such as oysters, sea scallops, razor clams, soft-shell clams, blue mussels, and northern Quahogs in estuarine, bay, and ocean habitats 10. Shellfish beds are unique habitats and provide a number of ecosystem services including sediment stabilization, habitat for marine organisms, food for marine wildlife and humans, carbon sequestration, water filtration and nutrient cycling 1,4. Because shellfish beds anchor sediments, they act as buffers against ocean wave and current impacts and can alter flow and turbulence in intertidal channels 16. Oyster beds also help reduce erosion from storm surges and wave energy in inland areas 2.
Shellfish are filter feeders and remove very small particles from the water column, such as plankton, suspended organic matter, and even contaminants 4. This function improves water clarity, light penetration, and overall water quality. Shellfish beds also provide excellent habitat for many marine invertebrates, such as worms, crabs, snails, and sea stars 1,4. Shellfish beds occur in various types of estuarine and marine habitats, with some species such as soft-shell clams, occurring near the mouths of creeks and in slack waters near sand bars or islands, while others such as sea scallops occur in deeper marine waters along the continental shelf 8. Shellfish are excellent indicators of environmental conditions and because of their good preservation in fossil records and wide distribution, they can serve as natural recorders of historical change in coastal areas 6.
Some shellfish, such as blue mussels, have strong flexible strings known as "byssal threads" that are secreted from glands in their foot. This feature enables them to anchor to hard surfaces, including other shells, and they are often found in large groups known as “clumps”. Other shellfish, such as scallops and razor clams, do not attach to each other, but anchor as individuals to the bottom. Byssal threads also allow some degree of movement, facilitating reposition relative to currents, as well as within mussel clumps 13. Species, such as oysters and softshell clams, can’t move and therefore rely heavily on early life phases to settle new areas and maintain populations 12,15.
Shellfish are currently threatened by urbanization, excess nutrients and contaminants, and fishing gears that come into contact and physically damage bottom habitats or re-suspend sediments 14. Sediment altering activities such as dredging, along with jetty and seawall construction, negatively impact shellfish populations through suffocation or changing the availability and distribution of preferred sediment. Nearshore shellfish beds are at the highest risk from human activities. In many places, shellfish have declined due to increasing disease and parasite outbreaks, which have become more widespread due to reduced water quality and increased salinity.
Climate Impacts
Shellfish beds will be impacted by climate change in multiple ways, including through increased temperatures, precipitation and runoff, as well as ocean acidification from increased CO2 and consequent changes in ocean pH. Increased water temperatures are expected to increase outbreaks of disease and parasites, which contribute to the decline of many shellfish species 4. This is worsened by reduced water quality and increases in salinity. Expected increases in precipitation and storm events will likely influence sediment distribution patterns, which will also impact shellfish communities. Shellfish that burrow, such as clams, require a specific sediment size for burrowing, which can be disrupted by human activities as well as climate change impacts 5.
Ocean acidification is projected to significantly increase in the coming centuries as a result of CO2 absorption by the ocean 3 and have some of the most negative impacts on calcifying marine organisms including shellfish, corals, and crustaceans 7,9. Global losses of shellfish production due to ocean acidification are estimated around 100 billion dollars 11. Sea level rise will also impact shellfish beds. For instance, vertical oyster reef growth depends on salinity and the amount of time they are exposed to air (emerge) during a tidal cycle. For mature intertidal reefs (oyster reefs at least 10 years old), areas that showed the highest mean growth were exposed to air 20-40% of the daily tidal cycle (i.e. at low tide). If oyster reefs are located in areas that receive less than 10% exposure to air time during tidal cycles, little to no growth will occur. In these areas, increasing rates of sea level rise will likely outpace vertical reef accretion and contribute to loss of habitat, especially along developed shorelines where the ability of reefs to migrate inland is limited 17. Some species may be able to cope with changes in water levels by migrating to different areas with more optimal conditions.
1. Arribas, L.P., L. Donnarumma, M.G. Palomo, and R.A. Scrosati. 2014. Intertidal mussels as ecosystem engineers: their associated invertebrate biodiversity under contrasting wave exposures. Marine Biodiversity 44:203-211.
2. Brandon, C.M., J.D. Woodruff, P.M. Orton, and J.P. Donnelly. 2016. Evidence for elevated coastal vulnerability following large-scale historical oyster bed harvesting. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.
3. Caldeira, K., and M.E. Wickett. 2003. Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425:365.
4. Donovan, A. and M. Tyrrell. 2005. From Dune to Shining Sea: The Coastal and Marine Habitats of Massachusetts. Coastlines:Winter 2004-2005. Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management. Available online at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/czm/coastlines/coastlines04-05.pdf (viewed 3/18/2016).
5. Fiori, S.M., and M.C. Carcedo. 2015. Influence of grain size on burrowing and alongshore distribution of the yellow clam (Amarilladesma Mactroides). Journal of Shellfish Research 34:785-789.
6. Fortunato, H. 2016. Mollusks: Tools in environmental and climate research. Amer. Malac. Bull. 33:310-324.
7. Gazeau, F., C. Quiblier, J.M. Jansen, J.P. Gattuso, J.J. Middelburg, and C.H.R. Heip. 2007. Impact of elevated CO2 on shellfish calcification. Geophysical Research Letters 34:1-5.
8. Hart, D.R., and A.S. Chute. 2004. Sea Scallop, Placopecten magellanicus, Life History and Habitat Characteristics. Essential Fish Habitat Source Document. Second Edition. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-189. National Marine Fisheries Service, Woods Hole, MA.
9. Kroeker, K.J., R.L. Kordas, R.N. Crim, and G.G. Singh. 2010. Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms. Ecology Letters 13:1419-1434
10. Massachusetts Bays National Estuary Program (MassBays). Boston Harbor Habitat Atlas: Shellfish Beds. Available online at: http://www.mass.gov/envir/massbays/bhha_shellfish.htm (viewed 3/19/2016)
11. Narita, D., K. Rehdanz, R.S.J. Tol. 2012. Economic costs of ocean acidification: a look into the impacts on global shellfish production. Climatic Change 113:1049-1063.
12. Newell, C.R., and H. Hidu. 1986. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (North Atlantic) –softshell clam. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report. 82(11.53). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4. 17 pp.
13. Newell, R.I.E. 1989. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (North and Mid-Atlantic)-blue mussel. U.S. Fish. Wildlife Service Biological Report. 82(11. 102). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR El-82-4. 25 pp.
14. New Hampshire Fish & Game Department (NHFG). 2013. Ecosystems and wildlife climate change adaptation plan. Concord, NH.
15. Sellers, M.A., and J. G. Stanley. 1984. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (North Atlantic) -American oyster. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-82/11.23. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, TR EL-82-4. 15 pp.
16. Styles, R., 2015. Flow and turbulence over an oyster reef. Journal of Coastal Research 31:978–985.
17. Ridge, J.T., A.B. Rodriguez, R.J. Fodrie, N.L. Lindquist, M.C. Brodeur, S.E. Coleman, J.H. Grabowski, and E.J. Theuerkauf, 2015: Maximizing oyster-reef growth supports green infrastructure with accelerating sea-level rise. Scientific Reports, 5:14785, DOI: 10.1038/srep14785.
You are here
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Estuarine habitats (New Hampshire)
Primary tabs
Submitted by smattocks on
Unpublished
This habitat was described as vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Increasing freshwater runoff events will result in sudden inputs of warm water particularly during summer, increased sedimentation and turbidity, erosion, higher nutrient inputs, and periods of lower salinity
- Extended summer droughts may result in lower nutrient inputs, but higher temperatures could lead to hypoxia
- Higher temperatures may benefit pathogens or invasive species?
New Hampshire Fish & Game Department (NHFG). 2013. Ecosystems and wildlife climate change adaptation plan. Concord, NH.
Add new comment
-My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
You can share your favorites list with others using this link: https://staging.climateactiontool.org/favorites/127
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.
© 2016 University of Massachusetts Amherst | This site is maintained by The Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment in the College of Natural Sciences at UMass Amherst
Site Policies | UMass Extension Civil Rights and Non-Discrimination Information
You are here
Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment: Estuarine habitats (New Hampshire)
Primary tabs
Submitted by smattocks on
Unpublished
This habitat was described as vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Increasing freshwater runoff events will result in sudden inputs of warm water particularly during summer, increased sedimentation and turbidity, erosion, higher nutrient inputs, and periods of lower salinity
- Extended summer droughts may result in lower nutrient inputs, but higher temperatures could lead to hypoxia
- Higher temperatures may benefit pathogens or invasive species?
New Hampshire Fish & Game Department (NHFG). 2013. Ecosystems and wildlife climate change adaptation plan. Concord, NH.
Add new comment
-My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
You can share your favorites list with others using this link: https://staging.climateactiontool.org/favorites/127
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.
© 2016 University of Massachusetts Amherst | This site is maintained by The Center for Agriculture, Food and the Environment in the College of Natural Sciences at UMass Amherst
Site Policies | UMass Extension Civil Rights and Non-Discrimination Information
Related Adaptation Strategies and Actions
Related Species
My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.