You are here
Ecology and Vulnerability Coastal: Rocky shores
Ecology and Vulnerability
Coastal: Rocky shores
Background
Rocky shores are dynamic intertidal shoreline habitats, which are exposed to constant wave and wind action and undergo alternating periods of air exposure and... Read More
Background
Rocky shores are dynamic intertidal shoreline habitats, which are exposed to constant wave and wind action and undergo alternating periods of air exposure and water submersion with tidal cycles. These habitats experience seasonal changes in salinity, inundation level, and temperature. Organisms such as algae, kelp, mussels, crabs, lobsters, snails, and sea urchins are characteristic of rocky shores, as well as a variety of fish. Rocky shore composition can range from large boulders to medium sized gravel and cobble; these features strongly influence the species that found at each location. For example, shores with large rock arrangements are often dominated by brown algae, barnacles, and mussels, while cobble shores host smaller, short-lived organisms, such as small marine invertebrates (beach hoppers and scuds) 2.
Rocky shore zones are distinguished by their exposure to the elements:
- Splash zones are the upper sections, or highest points, of rocky shores. They are exposed to air and waves and typically dominated by dark lichen.
- The high intertidal zone is just below the splash zone, becoming submerged during high tides, and exposed to air when tides retreat. Barnacles and mussels dominate this habitat.
- The lower intertidal zone is only exposed to air briefly during low tides and is dominated by algae.
All of these zones host a dynamic community of marine organisms that are an important part of terrestrial and marine food webs. The structural integrity of these zones protects shorelines from erosion (vegetation, shellfish beds) 8.
Rocky shores are currently threatened by coastal development. Dredging can cause rocky shores to be smothered with sediment, which impacts resident plant and animal communities. Pedestrian trampling threatens many organisms that dwell and utilize rocky shores. Submerged rocky habitat is also vulnerable to damage from fishing gear, particularly from trawls and boat anchors 12.
Artificial rocky shores also occur in Massachusetts for stabilization purposes such as shoreline hardening and bridge foundations. These habitats can provide similar ecosystem services to rocky shores; however, artificial habitats are susceptible to colonization by non-native marine species 11. In addition, shoreline hardening may be harmful to some coastal species as hardened shores can reduce natural coastal habitats, such as salt marshes, over time 4.
Climate Impacts
Many organisms that live in rocky shore habitats are vulnerable to impacts associated with climate change. Ocean acidification is projected to significantly increase in the coming centuries, as a result of CO2 absorption by global oceans 1, and have some of the greatest impacts on calcifying marine organisms that live along rocky shores, including shellfish, corals, and crustaceans 3,6. The combination of increased ultraviolet radiation (UV rays), water temperature, and changes in salinity negatively impact the development and survival of snails and other mollusks that depend on rocky shores 10. Changes in food supply from altered plant communities and increased water temperatures can also significantly impact rocky shore mussels 9.
Many organisms that live in the intertidal habitats of rocky shores persisted during the last ice age and thus have evolved to accommodate a wide range of environmental conditions 7. However, it is unclear if these communities will be able to keep pace with projected rates of sea level rise or run out of optimal habitat and become submerged. If suitable rocky habitats exist up gradient of current intertidal zones, plants and invertebrates should be able to migrate to more elevated habitats unless human or natural barriers prevent this movement 5.
1 Caldeira, K., and M.E. Wickett. 2003. Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425:365.
2 Donovan, A. and Tyrrell, M. 2005. From Dune to Shining Sea: The Coastal and Marine Habitats of Massachusetts. Coastlines: Winter 2004-2005. Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management.
3 Gazeau, F., C. Quiblier, J.M. Jansen, J.P. Gattuso, J.J. Middelburg, and C.H.R. Heip. 2007. Impact of elevated CO2 on shellfish calcification. Geophysical Research Letters 34:1-5.
4 Gittman, R.K., F.J. Fodrie, A.M. Popowixh, D.A. Keller, J.F. Bruno, C.A. Currin, C.H. Peterson, and M.F. Piehler. 2015. Engineering away our natural defenses: an analysis of shoreline hardening in the US. Front Ecol Environ 13: 301-307.
5 Kendall MA, MT Burrows, AJ Southward, and SJ Hawkins. 2004. Predicting the effects of marine climate change on the invertebrate prey of the birds on rocky shores. Ibis 146:40-47.
6 Kroeker, K.J., R.L. Kordas, R.N. Crim, and G.G. Singh. 2010. Meta-analysis reveals negative yet variable effects of ocean acidification on marine organisms. Ecology Letters 13:1419-1434
7 Marko P.M., J.M. Hoffman, S.A. Emme, T.M. McGovern, C.C. Keever, and L.N. Cox. 2010. The ‘Expansion-Contraction’ model of Pleistocene biogeography: rocky shores suffer a sea change? Molecular Ecology 19:146-169.
8 Massachusetts Bays Program. 2016. Boston Harbor Habitat Atlas: Rocky Intertidal. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Accessed 7/1/16. Available at http://www.mass.gov/envir/massbays/bhha_rockyintertidal.htm.
9 Menge B.A, F Chan, J Lubchenco. Response of a rocky intertidal ecosystem engineer and community dominant to climate change. Ecology Letters 11:151-162.
10 Przeslawski R., A.R. Davis, and K. Benkendorff. 2005. Synergistic effects associated with climate change and the development of rocky shore molluscs. Global Change Biology 11:515-522.
11 Tyrrell MC and Byers JE. 2007. Do artificial substrates favor nonindigenous fouling species over native species? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 342:54-60.
12 Macdonald, D. S., M. Little, N. Clare Eno, and K. Hiscock. 1996. Disturbance of benthic species by fishing activities: a sensitivity index. Aquatic Conservation 6:257-268.
This habitat was described as vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Sea level rise
- Increased storm activity
This habitat was described as vulnerable to climate change because of the following factors:
- Sea level rise
- Increased storm activity
New Hampshire Fish & Game Department. 2013. Ecosystems and wildlife climate change adaptation plan. Concord, NH. Available at: http://www.town.hillsborough.nh.us/sites/hillsboroughnh/files/file/file/...
Although this habitat was identified as having a low vulnerability to climate change, factors that increase vulnerability include:
- Sea level rise
- Ocean acidification... Read More
Although this habitat was identified as having a low vulnerability to climate change, factors that increase vulnerability include:
- Sea level rise
- Ocean acidification
Whitman, A., A. Cutko, P. De Maynadier, S. Walker, B. Vickery, S. Stockwell, and R. Houston. 2013. Climate change and biodiversity in Maine: vulnerability of habitats and priority species. Report SEI-2013-03. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences (in collaboration with Maine Beginning with Habitat Climate Change Working Group), Brunswick, ME.
Related Adaptation Strategies and Actions
Related Species
My Favorites
Show my favoritesHide my favorites
More info
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.