You are here
Changes in hydrology
Flow volume is the amount of water expected to flow through water bodies like streams and rivers. These are modeled from a combination of stream flow data and precipitation predictions for current (2010) and projected future (2080) conditions. Data are from the Conservation Assessment and Prioritization System (CAPS) and the Designing Sustainable Landscapes (DSL) projects at UMass Amherst.
Use checkboxes to turn layers on or off. For the best representation of overlapping layers, view them one at a time. Slide the toggle bar in the legend to change the transparency of map layers.Hide
Flow volume is the amount of water expected to flow through water bodies like streams and rivers. These are modeled from a combination of stream flow data and precipitation predictions for...Read More
Changes in hydrology
Climate-induced changes in precipitation, winter conditions, and extreme storm events have increased base and average stream and river flows in many parts of New England. Land use practices, water withdrawals for human use, and development are also influencing hydrological conditions of water bodies and aquifers. Intensification of the hydrologic cycle (evaporation, condensation, precipitation, etc.) due to climate change and extreme precipitation events can increase the delivery of nutrients and pollutants to downstream and coastal habitats. This has important implications for food-web structure and ecosystem function, such as making poor water quality events (e.g., excessive nutrient loading) and the incidence of waterborne disease more likely. Hydrological conditions and the ability of aquatic species to travel from stream to stream (i.e., aquatic connectivity) are important for aquatic fish and wildlife survival. Human structures that intersect with aquatic systems, such as dams, culverts, and road crossings, are potential barriers to fish and wildlife movement.
Stream and River Flows
Climate change directly impacts stream and river flows through changes in precipitation, temperature, and evapotranspiration? (the sum of evaporation and the movement and exchange of water among plants, land, waterbodies, and the atmosphere). However, impacts will vary among basins based on:
The types and amount of vegetation and forest cover along the banks of streams and rivers
Extent of nearby urbanization
Annual average river and stream flow rates have increased during the last part of the 20th century throughout the Northeast region, even though peak flow rates have remained constant. “Low flows” play a crucial role in maintaining aquatic ecosystems as they provide a base level of flow (i.e., sustained flows composed of normal inputs from groundwater and precipitation) and help control stream water temperatures, particularly during summer. What constitutes a low or minimum flow varies by study, location, and season, but is generally the lowest flow for that site (excluding zero level flows or no water) over a defined time period (e.g., a week). Precipitation increases due to climate change do not appear to be changing low flows consistently across all seasons; for example, there is evidence that more precipitation during late summer/early fall has increased low flows later in the fall.
Seasonal and Decadal Influences on Flows
Warmer winter and early spring temperatures are leading to earlier snowmelt, more rain-on-snow episodes, and the breakup of winter ice on regional water bodies. Because of this, the timing and magnitude of spring flows is shifting, which affects fish and other aquatic or wetland species that depend on flows and aquatic corridors for migration, spawning, development of early life stages, or other vital life cycle transitions. Winter-spring peak flows occur approximately 6 days earlier compared to a century ago in Massachusetts and this trend is projected to continue during the 21st century. In addition, a shift toward higher winter flows and lower spring flows has been documented for the Connecticut River Basin as well as just to the north in New Hampshire at the Hubbard Brook Long Term Ecological Research Station using climate-driven streamflow simulations.
Large shifts in the magnitude of maximum annual streamflows have also been documented in many stream and river basins in New England. These shifts are associated with decadal climatic cycles such as the North Atlantic Oscillation, a natural, somewhat random phenomenon that produces changes in atmospheric pressure and sea level heights. These shifts are abrupt and short-lived, lasting no longer than a year. Larger peak seasonal flows and velocities contribute to increases in river scour magnitude and frequency, and affect egg burial depths, displacement, and survival of some fish and animals, such as freshwater mussels.
Groundwater Influences on Streams and Rivers
Groundwater inputs into streams and rivers are also important regulators of temperature and flow. Groundwater can contribute to coldwater refugia for fish and other cold-adapted aquatic organisms, especially during summer and low flow periods. Changes due to winter warming and the timing of spring melting are expected to reduce groundwater reserves during subsequent seasons. In addition, drought conditions affect water supply to freshwater systems and impact their chemistry and temperature; the magnitude of these effects is partially dependent on whether the system is primarily fed by groundwater or surface waters (e.g., stream flows and rainfall). Alternatively, recent studies in New England suggest groundwater table levels are rising, potentially increasing the risk for flooding.
Lakes and Pond Levels
Lakes are indicators of climate change in part because they reflect climatic warming and are directly influenced by changes to the surrounding terrestrial landscape. Lakes are warming at rates similar to air temperatures on a global scale. Responses of lakes to climate change are complex and variable, and often depend on individual basin characteristics, such as:
- Water depth
- Surface water influences
- Groundwater influences
- The local landscape
Nearby vegetation and forest coverage will affect how exposed or sheltered small and large water bodies are to wind, which influences the vertical distribution of water temperatures (i.e., temperatures at varying depths). Vegetation can also provide protection from erosion and the influx of nutrients and pollutants to lakes and ponds.
Climate Induced Changes in Nutrient Levels to Lakes and Ponds
Increased precipitation and extreme events due to climate change are increasing the delivery of nutrients to lakes from terrestrial runoff, which results in degraded water clarity and increased stratification (i.e., increasing the difference between warmer surface waters and colder bottom waters). These chemical and physical changes have important impacts on photosynthesis and aquatic food-webs. Lakes and ponds are also impacted by atmospheric deposition of sulfur and nitrogen oxides, which change the chemistry of waters through acidification.
Acidification (or deacidification) affects the levels of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) as well as water temperature and clarity. DOC is generated from the decomposition of living matter, such as vegetation and animals, and represents the primary form of carbon transported and exchanged within soils and aquatic ecosystems. DOC is naturally higher in certain types of waterbodies, such as those with surrounding wetlands or peatlands, but can also be the result of pollution. Too much DOC in a system can result from high nutrient loading that overstimulates primary production, for example from an algae bloom. This leads to increased rates of decomposition and ultimately hypoxic (low oxygen) conditions that can be deadly to other organisms.
Seasonal Changes in Ice and Water Levels
Warmer winter air temperatures are impacting ice cover and duration over lakes and ponds in Massachusetts. Ice on lakes and ponds has been breaking up earlier by a week or more in New England. Earlier melting of snow and ice during winter and spring are altering the seasonal patterns of water levels, or the hydroperiod, in water bodies and surrounding wetlands. Future projections of climate change are expected to reduce the hydroperiod of ephemeral ponds and wetlands (e.g., vernal pools) due to temperature effects on evaporation rates, and changes in seasonal precipitation rates. However, trends in evapotranspiration? rates vary widely across studies and are generally inconclusive. No trend has been seen in evapotranspiration measurements in the Connecticut River Basin since 1950.
Related Adaptation Strategies and Actions
1. Adrian, R. C. M. O’Reilly, H. Zagarese, S. B. Baines, D. O. Hessen, W. Keller, D. M. Livingstone, R. Sommaruga, D. Straile, E. Van Donk, G. A. Weyhenmeyer, and M. Winder. 2009. Lakes as sentinels of climate change. Limnology and Oceanography 56(6):2283-2297.
2. Andrew, J., D. Norman, B. Keller, R. Girard, J. Heneberry, J. M. Gunn, D. P. Hamilton, and P. A. Taylor. 2008. Cooling lakes while the world warms: Effects of forest regrowth and increased dissolved organic matter on the thermal regime of a temperate, urban lake. Limnology and Oceanography 53(1):404-410.
3. Brooks, R.T. 2009. Potential impacts of global climate change on the hydrology and ecology of ephemeral freshwater systems of the forests of the northeastern United States. Climate Change 95:469-483.
4. Campbell, J. L., S. V. Ollinger, G. N. Flerchinger, H. Wicklein, K. Hayhoe, and A. S. Bailey. 2011. Past and projected future changes in snowpack and soil frost at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA. Hydrological Processes 24:2465-2480.
5. Collins, M. J. 2009. Evidence for changing flood risk in New England since the late 20th century. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45:279-290.
6. Comte, L., L. Buisson, M. Daufresne, and G. Grenouillet. 2013. Climate-induced changes in the distribution of freshwater fish: observed and predicted trends. Freshwater Biology 58:625-639.
7. Goode, J. R., J. M. Buffington, D. Tonina, D. Isaak, R. F. Thurow, S. Wenger, D. Nagel, C. Luce, D. Tetzlaff, and C. Soulsby. 2013. Potential effects of climate change on streambed scour and risks to salmonid survival in snow-dominated mountain basins. Hydrological Processes 27:750-765.
8. Grimm, N. B., et al. 2013. The impacts of climate change on ecosystem structure and function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:474–482.
9. Hayhoe, K., C. P. Wake, T. G. Huntington, L. Luo, M. D. Schwartz, J. Sheffield, E. Wood, B. Anderson, J. Bradbury, and A. DeGaetano. 2007. Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the US Northeast. Climate Dynamics 28:381-407.
10. Hayhoe, K., C. Wake, B. Anderson, X.Z. Liang, E. Maurer, J. Zhu, J. Bradbury, A. DeGaetano, A. M. Stoner, and D. Wuebbles. 2008. Regional climate change projections for the Northeast USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 13:425-436.
11. Hodgkins, G. A., and R. W. Dudley. 2006. Changes in the timing of winter-spring streamflows in eastern North America, 1913-2002. Geophysical Research Letters 33: L06402.
12. Hunt, R.J., Walker, J.F., Selbig, W.R., Westenbroek, S.M., and Regan, R.S., 2013, Simulation of climate-change effects on streamflow, lake water budgets, and stream temperature using GSFLOW and SNTEMP, Trout Lake Watershed, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5159, 118 p., http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2013/5159/
13. Nislow, K. H. and J. D. Armstrong. 2012. Towards a life-history-based management framework for the effects of flow on juvenile salmonids in streams and rivers. Fisheries Management and Ecology 19:451-463.
14. Pace, M. L., and J. J. Cole. 2002. Synchronous variation of dissolved organic carbon and color in lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 47:333-342.
15. Parr, D. and G. Wang. 2014. Hydrological changes in the U.S. Northeast using the Connecticut River Basin as a case study: Part 1. Modeling and analysis of the past. Global and Planetary Change 122:208-222.
16. Raymond, P. A., and J. E. Saiers. 2010. Event controlled DOC export from forested watersheds. Biogeochemistry 100:197-209.
17. Read, J. S., L. A. Winslow, G. A. Hansen, J. Van Den Hoek, P. C. Hanson, L. C. Bruce, and C. D. Markfort. 2014. Simulating 2,368 temperate lakes reveals weak coherence in stratification phenology?. Ecological Modelling. 291C: 142-150.
18. Schneider, P., and and S. J. Hook. 2010. Space observations of inland water bodies show rapid surface warming since 1985. Geophysical Research Letters 37:L22405.
19. Sharma S., et al. 2015. A global database of lake surface temperatures collected by in situ and satellite methods from 1985-2009. Nature: Scientific Data. 2:150008.
20. Watras, C. J., J. S. Read, K. Holman, Z. Liu, Y. Song, A. Watras, S. Morgan, and E. H. Stanley. 2014. Decadal oscillation of lakes and aquifers in the upper Great Lakes region of North America: Hydroclimatic implications. Geophysical Research Letters 41(2): 456–462.
21. Weider, K., and D. F. Boutt. 2010. Heterogeneous water table response to climate revealed by 60 years of ground water data. Geophysical Research Letters 37:L24405.
22. Williamson, C. E., J. E. Saros, W. F. Vincent, and J. P. Smol. 2009b. Lakes and reservoirs as sentinels, integrators, and regulators of climate change. Limnology and Oceanography 54:2273-2282.
23. Winslow, L. A., J. S. Read, G. A. Hansen, and P. C. Hanson. 2015. Small lakes show muted climate change signal in deep-water temperatures. Geophysical Research Letters 42(2): 355–361.
Click link above to view references.
Show my favorites
Bookmark your favorite pages here. See the "add this page link" to add a page to your favorites. Click the X to remove a page from the list.